The Good And The Bad Of A Mandatory Parent Participation Fee

When I worked as the principal of a privatereceived significant volunteer help that it didn't
elementary school, there was a debate going onhave to outsource. More got done for less
before I got there, and it was still going on after Imoney. If the family didn't do the work, the
left. The debate centered on the issue of creatingschool got a nice financial boon. Really, it was a
a "mandatory parent participation fee".win-win for the school, they said.
Basically, for those of you unfamiliar with thisThe reason this group put forward the proposal in
concept, a mandatory parent participation feethe first place was to combat declining volunteer
would be levied on every enrolled family in therates. With costs running so high, the school was
school. Let's say the amount was $1,000. This feeforced to rely on more and more volunteer help.
would have been over and above the regularWhen those volunteers weren't signing up for
tuition price. Even families on financial aid would bewhat the school needed, they came up with this
included.idea.
The fee would not be charged until the end ofThe group that opposed this fee claimed that
the school year, however. And the fee could besuch a fee was insulting to the tuition paying
lowered if the family participated in certain schoolfamilies of the school. By mandating participation,
sponsored events. For instance, if a parent servedthe school was taking away from the true spirit
as a chaperon for a field trip, the amount wouldof volunteerism, where people gave because they
be lowered by $150. Then if that same parentwere moved to give. Under such a system, they
attended a board meeting, he/she could take offargued, people would feel like indentured servants,
another $100. Furthermore, if this parentand the joy of volunteering would be lost.
volunteered to work the school auction as aThey also said that the system didn't allow for
committee chair, $500 could be deducted fromfamilies with special circumstances. For some
the bill.families, finding the time and the ability to
Eventually, with enough time invested, a familyvolunteer was next to impossible, due to job or
could completely eliminate their $1,000 participationfamily situations. Therefore, these people would
fee. If, however, a family decided not tobe penalized at the end of the school year for
participate at all or only on a couple of items, theyworking the second shift or having multiple
would be compelled to pay either the entirechildren where babysitting was a real concern.
amount or whatever amount they didn't work off.This was a pretty passionate subject, but one we
OK. That's the general idea behind the concept.did not act on during my time at the school.
What follows is the chief argument we heard onI would be interested in hearing if any of you
either side of the issue.readers have experience with such a system and
Those supporting the fee said that no matterwhat your school decided. There are many more
what, the school won. If a family paid off thearguments both for and against, but the main
entire amount through service, the schoolpositions, at least at my school, are listed above.